IRRIGATION AUSTRALIA WEBSITE Channel Seepage Management Tool

About this website Contact us Site map

Home

Seepage risk, potential

Identification & measurement

Remediation

Approach

1 Identify & quantify
2 Determine objectives
3 Collect & evaluate info
4 Review objectives
5 Determine criteria
6 Select techniques
7 Consider options
8 Cost estimates
9 Decision to pursue
10 Economic analysis
11 Prioritise techniques
12 Select technique
13 Undertake works
14 Maintenance program
15 Monitor effectiveness

Techniques

Remediation costs, benefits

Prioritisation of works

Project review

Case studies

Downloads

Glossary

References

13 Undertake remediation works

On this page go to
Successful installation
Related pages

Successful installation

Successful installation of remediation works is a key component in reducing the seepage rate from a channel.

Issues that need to be considered when developing a works program prior to construction include the:
  • lead time required for the supply and delivery of material to the site;
  • use of contract and/or RWA labour;
  • period of time available to undertake the remedial works; and
  • the expected climatic and site conditions which may influence the construction method or schedule.
During construction, relevant Quality Assurance procedures should be followed to ensure the placement and quality of any lining material or backfill meets the design requirements and specifications. Furthermore, the type, location, elevation and thickness of any lining material and/or backfill should be documented in the RWA’s Asset Management System to enable authority staff to assess status of the remedial works over its lifetime, and implement maintenance programs sensitive to the location and type of liner.

IAL trials and the literature show that benefits of the seepage reduction are not fully achieved unless the lining is correctly installed. Expertise of the personnel installing the lining and use of appropriate equipment is a key factor in the achievement of a correct and successful installation. Even for very small imperfections in channel lining of 0.01% of the wetted area (e.g. holes, tears, poor seams), seepage losses in experimental tests nearly reach that of the unlined condition (Abdel-Gawad et al, 1993).


Related pages Top button

Previous: 12 Select remediation technique
Next: 14 Develop and implement maintenance program
   

Home

How to use this website

Copyright

Disclaimer

Privacy

Page last reviewed on 8/3/04