IRRIGATION AUSTRALIA WEBSITE Channel Seepage Management Tool (Please click to return to home page)

About this website Contact us Site map

Home

Seepage risk, potential

Identification & measurement

Remediation

Approach

Techniques

Earthen Lining
Hard surface lining
Flexible membrane
lining
Groundwater
intervention

Remediation costs, benefits

Prioritisation of works

Project review

Case studies

Downloads

Glossary

References

Vegetation

On this page go to
Related pages

Pages in this section include:

  Groundwater intervention techniques
  Core trenching
  Groundwater pumping
Vegetation
  Tile drains

When seepage reduction via channel lining and other engineering solutions is not cost-effective, trees can often provide an economical means of managing the impacts of seepage (Goulburn-Murray Water - unpublished, 1999). Tree plantations do not prevent seepage, but intercept groundwater seepage flow and hence control local groundwater discharge which can degrade surrounding areas through waterlogging or salinity. Significant tree planting was carried out in the 1990s in Boort, Victoria, by providing financial assistance to landholders adjacent to channels (Dunstone, 1998). Investigations are underway as to the success of this scheme.

A number of trees are tolerant of high watertables and can transpire a lot of the seepage from the channel. Establishing trees in areas of seepage can reduce the watertable in a localised area around the tree. Some shrubs or bushes such as phalaris are also high-water-using plants (Wimmera Mallee Water, 1995).

Groundwater drawdown responses due to tree planting alongside channels have been demonstrated in a limited number of studies (Sonogan and Patto, 1985; Tagirov and Dosahmetov, 1970). The establishment of vegetation adjacent to channels has been shown to lower watertables associated with seepage. In doing so waterlogging is reduced and a slowing, or elimination of the process of soil salinisation and degradation can be achieved. However, it is recommended that the planting of trees not be undertaken where seepage rates are generally classified as high (Sonogan and Patto, 1985).

A study in the Shepparton Irrigation Region in northern Victoria demonstrated that tree plantations may not be a viable alternative to manage channel seepage for some sites. This study focused on groundwater/tree interactions and found that salt accumulation was occurring within the root zone in shallow watertable areas (Heuperman, 1999). Salt accumulation would be expected to increase to a threshold that restricts the water use and growth of the tree plantation (Morris and Collopy, 1999).
Planting of appropriate tree species tolerant to shallow watertables and saline conditions could assist with arresting the effects of channel seepage. Red gums, melaleucas and other selected species are planted near channels in northern Victoria and encouraged in salinity management plans (Sinclair Knight Merz, 1998).

Tree planting alone is unlikely to provide a sufficient control measure in the short term. Some other means, such as seepage interception, would probably be required to provide early benefits and enable the trees to grow to maturity. However, tree planting could be a valuable part of an overall long-term seepage control strategy (Sinclair Knight Merz, 1998).

Related pages Top button

Groundwater intervention techniques
Core trenching
Groundwater pumping
Tile drains
   

Home

How to use this website

Copyright

Disclaimer

Privacy

Page last reviewed on 11/3/04