IRRIGATION AUSTRALIA WEBSITE Channel Seepage Management Tool (Please click to return to home page)

About this website Contact us Site map

Home

Seepage risk, potential

Identification & measurement

Remediation

Approach

Techniques

Earthen Lining
Hard surface lining
Flexible membrane
lining
Groundwater
intervention

Remediation costs, benefits

Prioritisation of works

Project review

Case studies

Downloads

Glossary

References

Other Australian examples

On this page go to
Murray Irrigation Limited – Mulwala Canal
Goulburn Murray Water
Related pages

Pages in this section include:

  Earthen lining techniques
 

Compacted earthen liners

  Clay lining example: Channel 12
  Clay lining example: Waranga Western Channel
Other Australian examples
  Channel bank remodelling
  Loose earthen linings
  Bentonite treatments
  Modified soil earthen linings
  Soil sealants

Murray Irrigation Limited - Mulwala Canal Top button
(McCann and Kelly, 1998; Aseervatham and Thompson, 1998)

A 1.4km section of the southern embankment of the Mulwala canal managed by Murray Irrigation Limited was remediated using high-energy impact compaction of in-situ material.

Seepage was evident along the toe of the embankment and outside wall. A geotechnical inspection found that the banks were constructed with a combination of silty clays and silty sand clays of medium plasticity and clayey gravelly sands of low-to-medium plasticity.

A 4m-wide strip was graded on the crest of the bank to clear the topsoil and to provide a reasonable profile for compaction.

Compaction was undertaken using a three-sided high-energy impact compactor on the crest of the bank. Compaction was undertaken on a daily basis for 15 days with a few hours of compaction each day. High initial settlements were achieved over the first few days. Compaction was also done on the outside of the channel at the foot of the embankment in order to reduce seepage through the floor of the channel under the embankment.

The average and maximum settlement recorded on the embankment over the compacted area was 330mm and 410mm respectively and effective reduction in the embankment height of 15.5% and 18.5%.

Visual observations of the canal showed no evidence of water logging at the foot of the embankment. The watertable on the outside of the bank had dropped approximately 250mm indicating a reduction in the level of seepage.

Goulburn Murray Water Top button
(Dunstone, 1998)

To remediate seepage from a 2.2km reach of the CG Channel No. 4, Goulburn-Murray Water selected a compacted clay liner 300mm thick in conjunction with a geotextile underlay and a 150mm protective layer of crushed rock. The cost of stripping the old channel, laying the geotextile, placing and compacting the clay liner and the rock protection was estimated at $187/m (approximately $14/m2). The installation was expected to achieve a seepage rate of approximately 2L/m2/day.

Related pages Top button

Earthen lining techniques
Compacted earthen liners

Clay lining example: Channel 12
Clay lining example: Waranga Western Channel
Channel bank lining
Loose earthen linings
Bentonite treatments
Modified soil earthen linings
Soil sealants
   

Home

How to use this website

Copyright

Disclaimer

Privacy

Page last reviewed on 8/3/04