IRRIGATION AUSTRALIA WEBSITE Channel Seepage Management Tool (Please click to return to home page)

About this website Contact us Site map

Home

Seepage risk, potential

Identification & measurement

Remediation

Approach

Techniques

Earthen lining
Hard surface lining
Flexible membrane
lining
Groundwater
intervention

Remediation costs, benefits

Prioritisation of works

Project review

Case studies

Downloads

Glossary

References

Channel bank remodelling

On this page go to
Description
Experience
Site preparation
Installation
Maintenance
Durability
Seepage reduction
Cost
Advantages and disadvantages
Related pages

Pages in this section include:

  Earthen lining techniques
 

Compacted earthen liners

  Clay lining example: Channel 12
  Clay lining example: Waranga Western Channel
  Other Australian examples
Channel bank remodelling
  Loose earthen linings
  Bentonite treatments
  Modified soil earthen linings
  Soil sealants

Description Top button

Channel bank remodelling is employed by many water authorities in Australia. It is a form of compacted earthen lining undertaken when damage to the channel banks is thought to be the main cause of seepage. Banks are at least partially rebuilt with compacted clay material.

Experience Top button

Murrumbidgee Irrigation undertook the remodelling of a channel bank on the Lateral No. 9 Channel as part of the IAL Channel Seepage Remediation Project.

Site preparation Top button

Before commencement of remodelling, willow trees were removed, and the left-hand bank was stripped back to natural surface and all tree roots removed. Earthen blocks were placed across the channel at regular intervals to allow easy access for trucks and earthmoving equipment.

Installation Top button

In the trial section on Lateral No. 9, only the left-hand bank of the channel was remodelled as seepage was only evident on this side. In total 1,500m of bank was reconstructed, with only 800m of the channel was the subject of the pondage test before rehabilitation.

Clay material was sourced for this project from a storage site approximately 20km away. An assessment of the soil type (plasticity, dispersion, and permeability) concluded that the material was suitable for channel bank construction, given 95% compaction was achieved and moisture content was within 3% of optimum. The clay fill was compacted in layers of around 150mm until the bank level was raised above the design water profile (including some freeboard). Remodelling work was undertaken during late July and early August 2001.

Site conditions Top button

Light rainfall during construction made conditions greasy for trucks and earthmoving equipment, causing some down time.

Weather conditions Top button

Fog caused delays in the construction by restricting the travel speed of trucks bringing borrow material from 20km away.

Maintenance Top button

Properly constructed channel banks require little maintenance in the short term, but they should be inspected at least annually for erosion, dispersion, shrinkage cracks and other damage. It is recommended that stock be prevented from accessing the channel bank, as they can cause significant damage, particularly below the water line.

Durability Top button

Remodelled channel banks are estimated to last for 100 years.

Seepage reduction Top button

Baseline seepage rates at Lateral No. 9 ranged from 2.0-3.5L/m2/day. A post-construction pondage test was not undertaken by Murrumbidgee Irrigation, as the success of the seepage remediation work was evident by reclamation of 20ha of adjacent farmland. Previously only suitable for grazing due to its permanently wet state, the land is now under cereal crop production.

Cost Top button

A breakdown of the costs is presented in the table below. The total cost of $45,728 corresponds to a cost of $28.58/m for the 1,600m section or $9.53/m2 based on a surface area of 4,800m2 for the left-hand channel bank only.

The unit rates for the remodelling of the left-hand bank cannot simply be doubled to determine the remodelling costs for both banks. This is due to the differences between the conditions of the two banks.

The left-hand bank had numerous willow trees and associated roots, which required removal at an additional cost to normal remodelling.

Table 1 Breakdown of costs for channel bank remodelling

Item Cost ($) Cost ($/m)1 Cost ($/m2)2
Earth works (haul, compact and shape) $40,829.10 $25.52 $8.51
Tree removal $4,900.00 $3.06 $1.02
Total (for one bank) $45,729.10 $28.58 $9.53
Estimated total (for two banks) $81,658.20 $51.03 $17.01
1. Cost per metre based on remodelling 1,600m.
2. Cost per square metre based on a surface area of 4,800m2 (a perimeter of 3m on the left-hand bank only)


Advantages and disadvantages Top button

Advantages

Channel remodelling is a standard and straightforward technique for channel rehabilitation, for which water authorities have expertise and equipment.

Disadvantages

The availability and proximity of suitable clay material for bank construction may be limiting in some cases.

Rehabilitation works are undertaken only on the banks and not the bed of the channel, thus only remediating horizontal, and not vertical, seepage.

Related pages Top button

Earthen lining techniques
Compacted earthen liners
Clay lining example: Channel 12
Clay lining example: Waranga Western Channel
Other Australian examples

Loose earthen linings
Bentonite treatments
Modified soil earthen linings
Soil sealants
   

Home

How to use this website

Copyright

Disclaimer

Privacy

Page last reviewed on 8/3/04